|
On This Page
Putting the Amount Water Lost in Floods in Perspective
Is Canyon Dam Safe from Future Floods (Heading off a scare by
Bexar County Judge Nelson Wolf who issued a warning that Medina Lake dam might fail)
Would Releasing Water From Canyon Lake Have Saved New Braunfels and Homes
Around the Lake Shore?
Unmeasured Flow Into Canyon Lake
Click on Small Images to See a
Lager Picture
Looking
at these pictures, remember that the water left debris on top of the concrete pillars on
August 3, 1978 when the gage read 45.25 feet and a flow of 160,000 cfs. On June 27,
1997 the depth reached 45.12 and a flow of 116,000 cfs. Quite a difference for 1.5
inches in depth. (see footnote) These flood were of short duration compared to the
Flood of 2002. Check out the amount of water lost down the river at the bottom of
this page.
The Spring Branch gage has been faulty during the Flood of 2002. I
believe the gage was faulty during the 1998 flood as well. Eye witness accounts put
water over the pavement at the ends of the Hwy 281 bridge in 1998 but the maximum depth
recorded for Oct 17 was 32.68 feet. |
| Hwy 311 Bridge
on the Guadalupe River - Readings from the USGS Streamflow Gage 08167500 at Spring Branch* |

|
 |
 |
 |
July 3, 2002, noon
Depth 39 feet - Flow about 80,000 cfs |
July 5, 2002, 2:00 pm
Depth 28 feet - Flow 27,000 cfs |
July 6, 2002, 6:00pm
Depth 23 feet - Flow 24,000 cfs |
July 8, 2002, 4:00pm
Depth 10 feet - 5400 cfs |
Hwy 281 Bridge on the Guadalupe River - 1.5 miles upstream from the Spring Branch Gage |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Southbound Bridge
July 4, 2002, 6:00pm
Depth at SB Gage 32 feet - Flow 48,000 cfs |
Northbound Bridge
July 4, 2002, 6:00pm
Depth at SB Gage 32 feet - Flow 48,000 cfs |
Southbound Bridge
July 5, 2002, 1:30pm
Depth at SB Gage 28 feet - Flow 27,000 cfs |
Northbound Bridge
July 5, 2002, 1:30pm
Depth at SB Gage 28 feet - Flow 27,000 cfs |
* The Spring Branch Gage has been faulty and flow has not been
recorded since July 9. However, the readings seem to correlate with the pictures
reasonably. The problem for the permanent record is that a few inches makes a big
difference in total flow so the readings are not suitable for that purpose. When we
took the picture on July 3 at noon we were told the depth was 36 feet by people at the
bridge - the USGS man had just left. The gage had jumped in one 15 minute
period from 21 feet at 9:15am, an obvious error, to 35 feet at 9:30 which was reasonable.
The gage shows a steady rise from 35 feet to 39 feet from 9:30 to noon when
this picture was taken. It had been 36 feet at 10:30 and my friends on the
bridge had not noticed the rise. It is hard to eyeball river depth.
UPDATE on Spring Branch
Gage 07/15/02
When I took the picture below the USGS was making
manual flow readings from the Hwy 311 Bridge. These manual readings were simple
river depth (gage height) readings to take the place of the pressure transducer (PT)
readings since the PT was not working properly. This manual reading is also used to
calibrate the PT. The USGS confirmed that the only thing wrong with the PT was that
it had come loose and was flopping around on the bottom. From the variations in the
depth readings on the internet I do not think the error was too serious for our purposes
of gaging the rough quanitiy of water flowing into the lake.
The picture below was taken at the time the
manual reading was 13.55 feet. That corresponds pretty well with the
pictures and gage readings above. Plus or minus a foot is a lot of water.
Simple turbulence in the river during flood can make the manual reading off a few
inches.
I did learn that the USGS still makes manual
velocity versus depth readings at different flood stages and measures the bottom profile
since the river bed changes with every major flood. The PT data radioed back to
headquarters is converted to flow and put on the internet. Thiese reading are
adjusted later based on intermittent manual readings before becoming part of the permanent
record. |

July 15, 2002 at 3:15pm
|
Top of Page
The
Flood of 2002 Will Set a Record for Total Volume
The following was written July 5, 2002. A huge quantity of water has passed over the
Canyon Lake spillway since that time. Little water was let out of the dam compared to
inflow from July 1 to July 4 when water started going over the spillway. Water
passing New Braufels was used to estimate the amount of outflow for 24 hours.
The Guadalupe River at New Braunfels, Texas passed
between 60,000 and 65,000 cubic feet per second since 8:00 am July 5. It is 4:30pm
as this is written. Essentially no water was being passed by the dam until the
afternoon of July 4 when it was gradually increased to 3000 cfs just before water
started going over the spillway. I figure about 60,000 acre feet of water
passed over the dam in the last 24 hours. At the 950 foot elevation the Lake holds
830,000 acre feet of water or 444,000 acre ft above the normal pool elevation of 909
feet.
If no more water flowed into the lake from
this moment and it was drained down to 909 feet ,
that would be 504,000 acre feet of water from this storm down the Guadalupe to the Gulf.
In perspective, that is 164.3 billion gallons or enough water to supply 1,008,000
families of 4 with water for a year. That is water for 4,032,000
million people for a year. (At least this much more water flowed through
Canyon Lake in the following days.)
While the peak flows of past storms have not been
reached I think this flood will set a record for duration and total volume of water,
considering the flow in the Medina River as well.
Is the Dam Safe?
The lake can hold 1,129,300 acre feet and
I presume that is at the top of the dam. At that elevation the spillway would
discharge 502,800 cfs. Looks like there is an adequate factor of safety on the dam
capacity that Mother Nature will be hard pressed to beat. For comparison, the USGS
record shows a peak flow past New Braunfels in 1998 of nearly 150,000 cfs and the maximum
inflow to the lake was 160,000 cfs in 1978. The average flow that day was about
75,000 cfs.
Top of Page

Criticism of the Corps of Engineers for
not releasing water from Canyon Lake before water went over the spillway, was printed in
the San Antonio paper and in letters to the CLTG.
When it was noted that by law the Corps could not release water when
the flow at Gonzales was over 12,000 cfs (cubic feet per second), one Canyon Lake resident
was quoted as suggesting that the Corps should have broken the law.
For the record, the flow at Gonzales exceeded 12,000 cfs on July 2 at 10:00 pm
and dropped below 12,000 cfs on July 11 around midnight. On July 4, 2002 when
water just started to go over the spillway in Canyon Lake the flow at Gonzales was already
40,000 cfs.
We decided to check out what the effects would be had water been released at a steady
rate between July 1 and July 4 when the water went over the spillway a period of about 100 hours.
We did an analysis of the effect of releasing 5000 cfs constantly from the time the
lake level went above the conservation pool elevation of 909 feet and plotted the results
on a graph. The dashed curve on the graph is
the approximate manner in which the lake would fill under that scenario. The solid
curve is the actual lake level. To confirm
the dashed curve, 5000 cfs over 100 hours is about 40,000 acre feet. If you
take 40,000 acre feet out of the lake just as it reached the spillway at elevation 943
feet, the lake level would drop over 3 feet and require another 10 hours of the rate of
inflow at that time to reach the spillway. That
corresponds with the end point on the curve. More
details may be found at http://hillcountrywater.org
under Stream Flow Data
Letting water out as the lake level rose for this particular flood would have made
little difference in the magnitude of the flood but would have shortened the time the
river was at its peak below Canyon Lake by about 10 to 12 hours. However, releasing another 5000 cfs to the
river while Gonzales was above flood stage was simply not possible.
The
red curve was generated on an hourly basis which was tedious because the volume change in
the lake is different for each foot of elevation change as the lake rises. From
elevation 909 to 910 the volume increases 8436 acre feet. From elevation 942 to 943
the volume increases 12,800 acre feet.
Top of Page
|
Unmeasured Flow
Into Canyon Lake
 |
 |
Rebecca Creek on Brookside Dr.
July 3, 2002 |
Nov 16, 2001 after a similar flood. The dead tree
stump about 6 feet tall in the foreground may barely be seen in the photo to the left.
It is another 4 feet to the low water line from the base of the stump. |
| There are a number of creeks that flow into
Canyon Lake below the USGS Gage at Spring Branch. Rebecca Creek flows into the
Guadalupe just above the lake at the boat ramp in Cypress Cove subdivision. Rebecca
Creek is fed by a spring from a sink hole in the Cow Creek formation of the Trinity
Aquifer and flows year round. The watershed of the creek extends up to FM 473 about
1/2 mile west of Hwy 281. We have seen a 10 foot rise on this creek 3 times starting
with the 1998 flood, 2001 and now 2002. |
|