|
|
|
Analysis of Stream
Flow for the Guadalupe River Kerrville to Spring
Branch Summer Flow Rates
1951 - 2000 Southeast Trinity
Groundwater Conservation District Bulverde, Texas 78163
Foreword
The purpose of the analysis is to bring into perspective the effects of present day water
use on the Trinity Aquifer and on the Guadalupe River. This was done by comparing the
river flow in the months of July, August and September from 1951 through the present time. The Guadalupe River typically has its lowest flow
of the year during these months.
It is hoped that the STGCD and the general public will find the data helpful in evaluating
proposals for future use of the aquifer. Distribution
of this report is unlimited. However, it must
be distributed in its entirety. Further, the
data in this report cannot be interpreted properly if it is reproduced in black and white. Color copies are required.
Figures 2, 3 and 6 are intended to demonstrate the basic hydrology of the river and
aquifer when certain conditions of stream flow exist.
These figures do not purport to show actual levels of either the river or the
aquifer. Revision 1 September 21,
2000:
1984 data added to Figure 5
Introduction The stream flow at the
Spring Branch gage has been steadily decreasing and now stands at about 6 cubic feet per
second (cfs). This means that nearly 4
million gallons of water are disappearing in a 4.5 mile stretch of river each day. In addition, the drop in flow between the USGS
gage near Comfort and the Spring Branch gage is 11 cfs or an additional 7 million gallons
per day. A short time ago the
TNRCC was alarmed at this trend and was actively looking for people illegally pumping from
the Guadalupe river. It turned out that the
gage at Spring Branch was faulty and the loss was attributed to the bad gage. (However, the drop in flow between Kerrville to
Comfort was ignored. The drop between
Comfort and Spring Branch, although reduced by the repair, was still evident after the
gage was repaired and this was also ignored.) The
investigation was dropped. The reason the TNRCC
got excited about the drop in flow between the upstream gages and downstream gages is that
this is atypical of a spring fed river even in times of low rain fall. The Trinity aquifer feeds the Guadalupe river
along this entire stretch and the river flow increases as it moves downstream even in the
absence of rain. A review of the stream
flow records shows that in the summer of 1996 and in the summer of 2000, the Guadalupe
River, for the first time, is drying up starting at the lower elevation and proceeding to
the upper elevation. Normally, in time of
drought, the Guadalupe River dries up fairly uniformly along the length of river between
Comfort and Spring Branch. In some years the
Comfort gage registered zero flow first and in others the Spring Branch gage went dry
first. In any case, if the flow at one gage
registered zero, the flow at the other gage was extremely low. Prior to 1996 there had
been no significant reduction of flow rate between gage readings at Comfort and at Spring
Branch during an absence of rain. The
conclusion of this analysis is that the Guadalupe will run dry downstream of Highway 281
more frequently in the next 50 years than it did in the past 50 years because of increased
use of the Trinity Aquifer. Summer Stream Flow Analysis of the
Guadalupe River 1950-2000 Months of July, August and September
for the years 1986 1999 The months of July, August and September are months of maximum water usage for the Trinity aquifer and minimum stream flow for the Guadalupe river. Stream flow data for these three months were extracted from tabulated data for the following USGS stream flow stations on the internet.
In the absence of rain
the aquifer level drains to the creeks and rivers until the level of the aquifer is lower
than the river. At this point the river runs
dry. The aquifer water also runs
downhill within the aquifer itself but this is thought to be a slow movement. The path of least resistance is drainage via the
creeks and rivers. Of course pumping draws
down the aquifer level as well. The simple sketch shown in Figure 2 shows the relative levels of aquifer and river at Comfort and Spring Branch for most summers from 1986 to 1999. The river level a Comfort is lower
Figure 2 Normal Summer Stream Flow Between Comfort and Spring Branch Then in 1996, the
first really low summer flow since the 1960s, a different phenomenon occurs. As illustrated in Figure 3, the river flow rate
decreases as it flows downstream. The river
is fed by the aquifer above Comfort but somewhere below Comfort, the aquifer level drops
below the river. The river begins to
recharge the aquifer. If we assume that there
is no great amount of pumping directly from the river, then this must be caused by
increased drawdown of the Trinity aquifer by pumping.
In addition, increased drawdown of the Edwards aquifer could cause increased
outflow from the Trinity.
Figure 3 In 1996 The River Flow Decreases Between Comfort and Spring Branch
The river ran dry at
both locations about the same time and in 1953 the river ran dry at Comfort and did not
quite run dry at Spring Branch. The river was
near running dry at Comfort in 1957 when a flood of 10,000 cfs at Comfort and 15,000 cfs
at Spring Branch ended the dry year. As will
be shown the drought was not really ended by this flood. The point of this data
is to show how the river and aquifer behaved in dry years when there was no excessive
demand and no significant rainfall. Stream Flow Records for Summers of 1963, 1964, 1996 and 2000
Note that in both 1963 and 1964 the Guadalupe River went dry at the Comfort gage before it went dry at Spring Branch.. (The Kerrville gage was not installed until 1986). However, in the year 2000 the river is dropping rapidly at Spring Branch while there is decent flow at Kerrville and Comfort. (The gage at Spring Branch was out for a month and only 30 days of recent data is available for Spring Branch and Comfort.) There is also evidence of aquifer recharge from the river in the Spring Branch area in the summer of 1996 In early summer of 1996 the relative flow rate are similar to summer of 2000 prior to significant rainfall.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Recommendations
|
|
This site is maintained by email scgrigory@grigory.com for technical
comment or questions |